So, Jeff didn't get elected... he placed 15 out of 16 running (well ahead of 16 I might add). So his campaign is starting now.
Apparently, 22% of Lethbridge stuck its head out, saw something that might resemble progress and now we can expect three more years of the same, old "same, old".
Hurray for majority rule in our democratic society.
Sunday, October 28, 2007
Monday, September 24, 2007
Jeff Graham for Lethbridge City Council
The "Jeff Graham says... just vote" campaign is well underway for the 2007 Lethbridge Civic Election. Jeff's website has his contact information (see http://www.jeffgraham.ca/)
The city has its information here http://www.lethbridge.ca/election
Wikipedia has a page here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethbridge%2C_Alberta_municipal_election%2C_2007
and I wish that outbound links from candidates names to corresponding websites were not persistently removed as "advertising". Links to url's in support of wikipedia documents are encouraged.
UPDATE!
Having had some discussions on the related discussion page, the outbound linking has been fairly and equitably resolved. Thanks for your hard work, KmSiever!
The city has its information here http://www.lethbridge.ca/election
Wikipedia has a page here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lethbridge%2C_Alberta_municipal_election%2C_2007
and I wish that outbound links from candidates names to corresponding websites were not persistently removed as "advertising". Links to url's in support of wikipedia documents are encouraged.
UPDATE!
Having had some discussions on the related discussion page, the outbound linking has been fairly and equitably resolved. Thanks for your hard work, KmSiever!
If democracy is better than other government, why do we need to force people to choose it?
So, I was thinking, it wasn't too long ago that people were concerned with creeping communism and felt that we needed to convince wavering countries that democracy was way better. In fact, many democratic countries used various political, economic, and military means to persuade non-democratic countries to change. If democracy is so great, why do we have to shove it down people's throats?
ditto Communism
and most other -ism's for that matter
ditto Communism
and most other -ism's for that matter
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Great Customer Service
Great customer service is always refreshing. My two recent outstanding moments were at Applebees in Tacoma (on the I-5) and at Steeps in Calgary
I'm writing this from Steeps. I'm having a classic Earl Grey tea and a Turkey with Havarti sandwich (warmed). I needed a tie for a business meeting so they found me two menswear shops nearby.
Kudos also to Megatunes on 17th Ave here in Calgary for pointing me to Steeps.
I'm writing this from Steeps. I'm having a classic Earl Grey tea and a Turkey with Havarti sandwich (warmed). I needed a tie for a business meeting so they found me two menswear shops nearby.
Kudos also to Megatunes on 17th Ave here in Calgary for pointing me to Steeps.
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Dr. Jim Henry is passionate about barbershop
And I agree with him.
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=38F7BE0C6039A30E
Gold medal moments are important always.
You can be on a mission.
Sing-cerely,
Stephen
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=38F7BE0C6039A30E
Gold medal moments are important always.
You can be on a mission.
Sing-cerely,
Stephen
Sunday, July 15, 2007
Citizenship and Oaths of Allegiance
Over beer last night a friend of mine mentioned that his wife was not so keen on the Canadian Oath of Citizenship which is required to become a naturalized citizen in Canada
"I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfill my duties as a Canadian citizen."
Her objection seems to be the "bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,..." part.
She is a citizen of the United States of America by birth and probably has re-asserted their Pledge of Allegiance:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all."
It should (theoretically) be possible to fulfill both pledges, unless Canada goes to war against the United States of America. There is so much common ground in Canadian and U.S.A. law(s) that by working within the laws of Canada (as pledged), you can still ally yourself with a symbolic piece of cloth and the nation for which it stands without violating a pledge of allegiance to the Canadian head of state.
This is hardly different than the position expressed by Sheikh Ahmad Kutty, a senior lecturer and Islamic scholar at the Islamic Institute of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Muslims and the Canadian Oath of Allegiance[1]
Just a thought about allegiance to a republic: Since a republic is (more or less) a state where the government's political power depends solely on the consent, however nominal, of the people governed, then if the citizens choose to withdraw consent or otherwise disagree with those elected, anyone who would faithfully uphold the pledge should immediately seek to change the government.
That must be why the U.S. Government works so hard to keep all the citizens "on-side".
God Save the Queen.
"I swear (or affirm) that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Canada, Her Heirs and Successors, and that I will faithfully observe the laws of Canada and fulfill my duties as a Canadian citizen."
Her objection seems to be the "bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II,..." part.
She is a citizen of the United States of America by birth and probably has re-asserted their Pledge of Allegiance:
"I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands: one Nation under God, indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for all."
It should (theoretically) be possible to fulfill both pledges, unless Canada goes to war against the United States of America. There is so much common ground in Canadian and U.S.A. law(s) that by working within the laws of Canada (as pledged), you can still ally yourself with a symbolic piece of cloth and the nation for which it stands without violating a pledge of allegiance to the Canadian head of state.
This is hardly different than the position expressed by Sheikh Ahmad Kutty, a senior lecturer and Islamic scholar at the Islamic Institute of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on Muslims and the Canadian Oath of Allegiance[1]
Just a thought about allegiance to a republic: Since a republic is (more or less) a state where the government's political power depends solely on the consent, however nominal, of the people governed, then if the citizens choose to withdraw consent or otherwise disagree with those elected, anyone who would faithfully uphold the pledge should immediately seek to change the government.
That must be why the U.S. Government works so hard to keep all the citizens "on-side".
God Save the Queen.
Thursday, July 5, 2007
Who invited Louie to the Last Supper?
At least I'll have company if I go to hell.
Wednesday, June 27, 2007
About that Jesus guy...
'But what about you?' he asked. 'Who do you say I am?'
They answered, 'You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground of our being, the ontological foundation of the context of our very selfhood revealed.'
Jesus replied, 'What?'
They answered, 'You are the eschatological manifestation of the ground of our being, the ontological foundation of the context of our very selfhood revealed.'
Jesus replied, 'What?'
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Parliamentary Democracy
The name is derived from the French parlement, the action of parler (to speak): a parlement is a talk, a discussion, hence a meeting (an assembly, a court) where people discuss matters. (see Wikipedia: Parliament)
Canadian parliamentarians have got the talking down to a fine art, mostly, but have missed the rest of the definition. You know, the bit about discussion. In an good discussion people take turns talking and listening. The more people involved, the more time you spend listening.
In the next public forum leading up to a federal election, ask your incumbent M.P. if they have talked through, heckled, or otherwise ignored anyone in the House during question period. And preface it with my earlier comment about listening.
The concept of a federal Parliamentary Democracy has an excellent premise: Select a representative to discuss how to best govern the the country. By convention and like in most structured debates, some of the representatives argue "for" and others argue "against" legislation.
The discussion should be the most important shaping tool for the legislation. If our debates were not automatic "nay-saying" of what the Government (or Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition) are putting forth, but actual discussions of how to make the legislation best serve the country, Canada would likely be able to create the most supportive national milieu for people, industry, and the environment.
It might not work better, but it won't work any worse. And we'd could maintain our polite, Canadian ways.
Canadian parliamentarians have got the talking down to a fine art, mostly, but have missed the rest of the definition. You know, the bit about discussion. In an good discussion people take turns talking and listening. The more people involved, the more time you spend listening.
In the next public forum leading up to a federal election, ask your incumbent M.P. if they have talked through, heckled, or otherwise ignored anyone in the House during question period. And preface it with my earlier comment about listening.
The concept of a federal Parliamentary Democracy has an excellent premise: Select a representative to discuss how to best govern the the country. By convention and like in most structured debates, some of the representatives argue "for" and others argue "against" legislation.
The discussion should be the most important shaping tool for the legislation. If our debates were not automatic "nay-saying" of what the Government (or Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition) are putting forth, but actual discussions of how to make the legislation best serve the country, Canada would likely be able to create the most supportive national milieu for people, industry, and the environment.
It might not work better, but it won't work any worse. And we'd could maintain our polite, Canadian ways.
Tuesday, June 19, 2007
New and Improved
Several people I know complain about the phrase "New and Improved", asking "How can it be improved if it is new?"
I used to be one of those skeptics, but I thought... what if "new" and "improved" refer to different aspects of the product.
Consider: "MaelichPetroChem presents New and Improved Maelich-Brand Echidna Milk Substitute."
The new refers to the brand or product in Maelich's product lineup, the improved because we took "I Can't Believe it isn't Echidna Milk" brand echidna milk substitute and made it better. Q.E.D.
I used to be one of those skeptics, but I thought... what if "new" and "improved" refer to different aspects of the product.
Consider: "MaelichPetroChem presents New and Improved Maelich-Brand Echidna Milk Substitute."
The new refers to the brand or product in Maelich's product lineup, the improved because we took "I Can't Believe it isn't Echidna Milk" brand echidna milk substitute and made it better. Q.E.D.
Monday, June 18, 2007
Charter Rights in Canada
Recently a woman from out of the country gave birth prematurely. That child is deemed Canadian (under Canadian law). The parents had to pay 10's of thousands of dollars for medical expenses. We have "universal health care" for Canadian Citizens. To qualify for those benefits in Alberta, you must be an Alberta resident for at least 4 months (I think). A newborn cannot possibly have lived (independently) ANYWHERE for 4 months. The Charter guarantees equal treatment under the law without discrimination on the basis of age. Since that Canadian child could not ever have been accommodated under the law, the law discriminates unfairly on the basis of age.
My solution? Add a clause something like "or is under 4 months of age and has resided in the province since birth" or something like that... we wouldn't have to scrap or rewrite all the law, it would be reasonable under the Charter, and would work for the better health of Canadian citizens.
So there!
My solution? Add a clause something like "or is under 4 months of age and has resided in the province since birth" or something like that... we wouldn't have to scrap or rewrite all the law, it would be reasonable under the Charter, and would work for the better health of Canadian citizens.
So there!
On Self-Esteem.
What kind of loser suffers from low self-esteem?
Probably the kind that will buy my new book... "Self-Esteem for Dummies"
Probably the kind that will buy my new book... "Self-Esteem for Dummies"
Beer and Women
Beer is good.
Women are good.
What about beer flavoured women? That could be amazingly refreshing. You could have an Amber, Dark, Honey-Brown, Pale, Stout, Bitter.
And jugs...
And head...
"mmmm.... Beer!" - Homer Simpson
Women are good.
What about beer flavoured women? That could be amazingly refreshing. You could have an Amber, Dark, Honey-Brown, Pale, Stout, Bitter.
And jugs...
And head...
"mmmm.... Beer!" - Homer Simpson
Friday, May 4, 2007
My company
My company is EFG Solutions Inc.
If it touches a computer we probably do it. We even do some accounting software work (although I swore I'd never do that stuff)
Cheers.
Stephen
If it touches a computer we probably do it. We even do some accounting software work (although I swore I'd never do that stuff)
Cheers.
Stephen
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)