Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Baby Steps

The Problem

After numerous attempts to get council to follow its own Procedure Bylaw 6250 and the Municipal Government Act by making inquiries and politely asking for justification, City Council has moved in the right direction. 

A bit.

They have actually started to address the agenda in official agenda order!

They have started to adopt amendments to the agenda before acting on those agenda items.

And sometimes --sometimes-- they follow the MGA before moving into closed session.

Not today, though. Also at least one time in the previous meeting. So maybe 10-20 times in the last year.

It shouldn't be that difficult. Madam City Clerk probably even has the motion on paper in front of the Mayor.

So where do I turn?

I've tried 311. I've tried Mayor and Council feedback form. I've tried conversations councillors. This is still a problem.

So I sent a message to the Minister with some details and asking for advice on how to proceed.

Time will tell.

Thursday, April 18, 2024

Q and A: The struggles of getting answers from Lethbridge City Council (Part 1 of ?)

I posted a question for @LethbridgeCity council on X. The response was, "Talk to 311."

I hit up 311 on the chat on the City of Lethbridge website with the same question. The response was, "Send your question to Mayor and Council using the online form." (Available here: https://www.lethbridge.ca/council-administration-governance/mayor-and-councillors/)

I sent my question via the form.

I waited.

That was February 7th, 2024.

While I was waiting, I had more questions. @LethbridgeCity on X.com referred me to 311 who referred me to the Mayor and Council Form where I submitted my seven questions and a request for an answer.

Your worship and council,

With regards to the proceedings of the February 27th, 2024 council meeting, I watched the broadcast of the meeting (those portions that were broadcast) and I have consulted the published agenda and subsequent minutes. I find that there are discrepancies between what I saw and what constitutes the official record:
·         Council moved to go into closed session at 12:30pm before the meeting was called to order at 1:30pm
·         The motion at 12:30pm to go into closed session references 3 items that were not on the published agenda.
·         When the agenda was adopted the three additional items presumably discussed in closed session were added to the agenda. These three added items were the only noted amendments to the agenda.
·         On the item of the Consent Agenda, the chair stated that the items in the consent agenda were those that were published in the agenda package, but there were two additional items added (and displayed on the screen) that were not on the published agenda nor on the amended agenda.
·         The minutes of the motion by Councillor Crowson at 2:47pm to go into closed session have more specific wording different from what was provided on the floor to the public in attendance.
·         There was no motion for nor mention of an amendment to OBM 6.1 nor to passing it as amended, but the motion in the minutes differs from the motion presented on the floor and in the agenda package.
Given that the “Agenda means the items of business of a meeting and the associated reports, bylaws or other documents and includes the order of business and time for said meeting” (Procedure Bylaw s.5(d) ), and that “If the agenda has been published, a Member may present an item as Urgent Business at the beginning of a meeting for inclusion on the Agenda” (Procedure Bylaw s.107(b)), and that “If a Council Member wishes to make change to the order of the agenda at the Meeting, the Council Member may, before the Agenda is adopted, make any such alteration by General Consent” (Procedure Bylaw s.110):
1)      Which Council Member presented items 14.3, 14.4 and 14.5 as Urgent Business at the beginning of the meeting? What was result of the vote to allow those items?
2)      Which Council Member wished to change the order of the agenda to consider items 14.1 through 14.5 earlier in the agenda? Was there general consent?
3)      Which Council Member wished to change the agenda to move items 14.1 and 14.2 into the consent agenda?
Both the MGA and the Procedure Bylaw give clear direction about holding meetings in closed session. From the Procedure Bylaw s.131: “Before holding a Closed Meeting, Council […] must adopt a motion, in a Meeting open to the public, that part of the Meeting be a closed meeting and the Motion must include: (a) the title of each item to be discussed; and, (b) the applicable provisions of the Act and/or FOIP.” From the MGA “197(4). Before closing all or any part of a meeting to the public, a council or council committee must by resolution approve (a) the part of the meeting that is to be closed, and (b) the basis on which, under an exception to disclosure in Division 2 of Part 1 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act, the part of the meeting is to be closed.”
4)      Did council pass a motion in an Open Meeting at 12:30pm to go into closed session for the stated purposes? Was the wording on the floor the same as that in the minutes?
5)      Did council fail to follow the requirements of the MGA and the Procedure Bylaw at 2:47pm when a non-conforming motion was put forward to go into closed session, which motion was passed and acted upon?
Given that the role of the Chair of any meeting includes the responsibility to preside over meetings and enforce the rules of the Procedure Bylaw, and that all Members having committed to the Council Code of Conduct Bylaw:
6)      Will the Mayor (as Chair) and any other Council Members commit to following the Procedure Bylaw in “the spirit of fairness, equality, and common sense”?
7)     Will the Mayor and other Council Members hold each other accountable to the Bylaws in accordance with the letter and spirit of the Code of Conduct Bylaw?
I look forward to your timely answers to these seven questions.
Regards,  
Stephen Graham
Lethbridge Alberta

And I waited.

That was March 5th, 2024.

On March 11th, I had an online chat with 311.


On March 12th, I submitted some more questions. This time directly to the Mayor and Council Form.



And I waited.

On March 25th, I was on a chat with 311 and did a follow-up on my 3 outstanding requests for information from Mayor and Council.



And I waited.

On March 28th, 2024, I happened to be in City Hall so I enquired at the 311 desk about this. The person at the desk referred me to call 311. I did.

The 311 person on the phone forwarded me to another person. I left a voicemail.

And I waited.

On April 8th, 2024, I phoned 311, I was transferred to the person tasked with resolving my questions. She apologized for the delay but there were some internal things happening. She was working on it and had to confer with colleagues. It would be 2-3 more days.

And I waited.

But today, April 18th, 2024 at 7:54 a.m., I received an e-mail from 311 Inquiry Resolution:

That's it. Not answers, just thanks for being interested, your concerns have been noted and forwarded.

I wonder how long I will have to wait to chat with the Mayor, City Manager, or City Clerk about this?

Is my next stop Municipal Affairs? The Ombudsman? Court of King's Bench?

I'm beginning to think council and administration don't want to be questioned.